重定向消息

AN-NIR-124

2025-02

用近红外光谱测定聚丙烯颗粒中的聚乙烯含量

Rapid analysis of recycled polyolefins


Summary

Next to polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) is the most widely used plastic worldwide. Recycling these polyolefins is problematic, since it is challenging to separate polyethylene from polypropylene using sink float separation. Increasing PE content in PP leads to a poor interfacial bond strength which could negatively impact the mechanical properties of the final molded product.

An efficient method to determine the polyolefin composition based on near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) analysis is presented in this Application Note. The main advantage is the short time to result. Compared to the time-consuming standard method (i.e., Differential Scanning Calorimetry or DSC), the analysis of polyethylene content in polypropylene using near-infrared spectroscopy is performed in just seconds.


Experimental equipment

OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid.
Figure 1. OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid.

Different polymer blends (n = 54) with varying polyethylene content from 0.5–35% were produced in a compounder. The polyethylene content was determined by weighing before the polymer blends were produced. All measurements on the OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid (Figure 1) were performed in rotation using a large sample cup to average the subsample spectra. This sample setup reduces the influence of the particle size distribution of the polymer particles.

Table 1. Hardware and software equipment overview.
Equipment Metrohm number
OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid 2.1071.0010
Large holder OMNIS NIR, 100 mm 6.07402.100
Large cup OMNIS NIR, 100 mm 6.07402.110
OMNIS Stand-Alone license 6.6072.208
Quant Development software license 6.06008.002

Result

The obtained NIR spectra (Figure 2) were used to create prediction models for two different polyethylene content ranges. The first correlation diagram (Figure 3) displays the relation between the NIR prediction and the reference values in the range of 0.5–35.0% PE content. Figure 4 displays the correlation in the polyethylene content range of 0.5–9.0%. The respective figures of merit (FOM) show that by selecting a smaller range, the absolute error can be lower compared to using the full PE range.

NIR spectra of different polymer blends with varying polyethylene content.
Figure 2. NIR spectra of different polymer blends with varying polyethylene content. Data was obtained with an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid.

Result PE content: 0.5–35.0%

 Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of polyethylene content in the range of 0.5–35.0%.
Figure 3. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of polyethylene content in the range of 0.5–35.0%.
SEC (%) SECV (%) R2CV
0.94 1.10 0.987

Result PE content: 0.5–9.0%

Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of polyethylene content in the range of 0.5–9.0%.
Figure 4. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of polyethylene content in the range of 0.5–9.0%.
 
SEC (%) SECV (%) R2CV
0.51 0.60 0.950

Conclusion

This Application Note shows the feasibility of NIR spectroscopy for the analysis of polyolefins. Detecting PE concentrations below 5% with the standard Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) method can be challenging and time consuming. Compared to DSC measurements (Table 2), near-infrared analysis saves significant time: one sample measurement is performed in a couple of seconds. Next to PE content, physical parameters like density can also be determined with NIRS.

Table 2. Time to result overview for the parameter of polyethylene content.
Parameter Method Time to result
PE content Differential Scanning Calorimetry ∼60 min per sample
咨询

瑞士万通中国

北京市海淀区上地东路1号院1号楼7层702
100085 北京

咨询

在线咨询